NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA T1000
We compared a Professional market GPU: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T1000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
T1000
+225%
2.5 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2100M
39
T1000
+882%
383
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Turing
Professional
Type
Desktop
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
752 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
576
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
TU117
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
