NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 154W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (67.20GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
+233%
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
576
Shading Units
96
48
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
55W
TDP
154W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
G80
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
