NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1800MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
10176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+4940%
38.71 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2100M
39
RTX A6000
+13712%
5387
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
752 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
84
576
Shading Units
10752
48
TMUs
336
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
GA102
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
