NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+376%
3.656 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
752 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
576
Shading Units
1024
48
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
TU117
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
