NVIDIA Quadro K2100M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.13GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2100M
+3239%
0.768 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
752 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.13GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
576
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
8.004 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
32.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
-
-
-
768.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 GFLOPS
32.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
55W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
G84
N15P-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
