NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1266MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+5%
6.18 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2016
Ampere-MW
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
1120 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
