NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1335MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+50%
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4.101 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Apr 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
24
2560
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.08 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.2 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.202 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.101 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
TU116
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
