NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 110W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 38% (1665MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
6.18 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation
+300%
24.72 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2023
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
1290 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
58
2560
Shading Units
7424
80
TMUs
232
48
ROPs
80
80
Tensor Cores
232
20
RT Cores
58
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.2 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
386.3 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.72 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.72 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
386.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD104
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
