NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
We compared a Professional market GPU: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and a Mobile platform GPU: 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (2000MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
+37%
4.096 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
Arc Pro A30M
+63%
378
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Professional
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
1024
72
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
