NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
1104 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+2653%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
6
1152
Shading Units
48
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
32W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
