NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 78W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+962%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
14
1152
Shading Units
112
72
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
78W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
