NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 48.13GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+287%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro K2100M
0.768 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+492%
231
Quadro K2100M
39
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
576
72
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK106
-
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
