NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+37%
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
-
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
1536
72
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
