Quadro K2000 vs Quadro K600
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro K600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Quadro K600 Advantages
Lower TDP (41W vs 51W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+118%
733
Quadro K600
336
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.504 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.02 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.4 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
14.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
41W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK107
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
