Quadro K2000 vs Tesla PG500 216
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
Tesla PG500 216 Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Tesla PG500 216
+1827%
14130
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1260 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
80
384
Shading Units
5120
32
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GV100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
