Quadro K2000 vs Quadro 6000 SDI
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 231W)
Quadro 6000 SDI Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
733
Quadro 6000 SDI
+40%
1028
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
51W
TDP
231W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x SDI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
2x SDI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GF100
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
