Quadro K2000 vs Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro K2000 Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 59W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
+316%
733
Quadro FX 1800
176
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
384
Shading Units
64
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
12
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
51W
TDP
59W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G94
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
