Quadro FX 3450 vs MTT S80
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 255W)
MTT S80 Advantages
Released 18 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Oct 2023
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
-
Shading Units
4096
12
TMUs
256
8
ROPs
256
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
255W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
Curie
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
22 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
3.0
Shader Model
6.5
