Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon RX 5700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX 5700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 180W)
Radeon RX 5700 Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Jul 2019
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1465 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
-
Shading Units
2304
12
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
64
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.4 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
248.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.90 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.949 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
496.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
180W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
Navi 10
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XL
(215-0917220)
(215-0917220)
Curie
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.8