Quadro FX 3450 vs RTX 6000 Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 300W)
RTX 6000 Ada Advantages
Released 17 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
18176 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Dec 2022
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
142
-
Shading Units
18176
12
TMUs
568
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
AD102
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
AD102
Curie
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
