Quadro FX 3450 vs GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 175W)
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Jul 2019
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
34
-
Shading Units
2176
12
TMUs
136
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
272
-
RT Cores
34
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.36 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.181 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
224.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x HDMI 2.0
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
TU106
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
TU106-410-A1
Curie
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
