Quadro FX 3450 vs GeForce GTX 1660
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 120W)
GeForce GTX 1660 Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Mar 2019
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
1408
12
TMUs
88
8
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
120W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
TU116
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
TU116-300-A1
Curie
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6
