Quadro FX 3450 vs Radeon RX 5600 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 and 6GB VRAM Radeon RX 5600 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro FX 3450 Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 125W)
Radeon RX 5600 OEM Advantages
Released 14 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jul 2005
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro FX Curie
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1130 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
Shading Units
2048
12
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
64
-
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
5.100 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
199.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.78 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
6.390 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
399.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
83W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
NV41
GPU Name
Navi 10
NV41 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XE
Curie
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.19 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
225 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
2.1 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
6.7