NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU
We compared a Professional market GPU: 2GB VRAM Quadro P620 and a Game console GPU: 4GB VRAM Atari VCS 400 GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1354MHz vs 1201MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.13GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
AMD Atari VCS 400 GPU 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (15W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P620
+200%
1.386 TFLOPS
Atari VCS 400 GPU
0.461 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Dec 2020
Quadro
Generation
Console GPU
Professional
Type
Game console
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
-
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1354 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1252 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR4
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.13GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
4
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
12
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.66 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.804 GPixel/s
43.33 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.41 GTexel/s
21.66 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
922.4 GFLOPS
1386 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
461.2 GFLOPS
43.33 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
28.82 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
15W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
Banded Kestrel
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
4.94 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
210 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
