FireGL V8650 vs H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 68.26GB/s)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
H3C XG310
+441%
2381
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Nov 2020
FireGL
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
DG1
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
80 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
Unknown
420 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
