NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
320 additional rendering cores
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 149% (1950MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+89%
3.994 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
108W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
DG2-128
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
