NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 570 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock784MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 108W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
+7165%
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 570
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2014
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
771 MHz
Base Clock
-
784 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
2
1344
Shading Units
16
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.680 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.44 GFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
108W
TDP
38W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
G84
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
