Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (784MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +12%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
784 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
172.8GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1344
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

21.95 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
87.81 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.107 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
87.81 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GK104
GK104-850-A2
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

108W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy