Quadro 3000M vs Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 2400W)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
16144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+12036%
52430
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
16384
40
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
2400W
-
Suggested PSU
2800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
100 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
