Quadro 3000M vs Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1759%
8033
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
20
240
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GP104
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
