Quadro 3000M vs GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
GRID RTX T10 4
+2214%
9999
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
56
240
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
TU102
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
