FireStream 9250 vs H3C XG310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM H3C XG310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 300W)
H3C XG310 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
H3C XG310
+138%
2381
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2020
FireStream
Generation
H3C Graphics
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.20 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.762 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.381 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
595.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
DG1
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
Unknown
256 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
