FireStream 9250 vs TITAN RTX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 24GB VRAM TITAN RTX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 280W)
TITAN RTX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3808 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
TITAN RTX
+1531%
16310
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2018
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 20
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
72
800
Shading Units
4608
40
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
169.9 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
509.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.62 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.31 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
509.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
280W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x USB Type-C
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
TU102-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
