ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7600 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2440MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2023
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2440 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
2048
4
TMUs
128
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
156.2 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.98 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
19.99 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
624.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Navi 33
-
GPU Variant
Navi 33 XL
(215-163000057)
R500
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.7
