ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Feb 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
36
-
Shading Units
2304
4
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
R500
Architecture
Turing
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
