ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 96GB VRAM RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 600W)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2617MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
24064 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Mar 2025
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Blackwell PRO W
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1590 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2617 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
96GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR7
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1.79TB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
188
-
Shading Units
24064
4
TMUs
752
4
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
752
-
RT Cores
188
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
128 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
502.5 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1968 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
126.0 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
126.0 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.968 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GB202
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
92.2 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
750 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
12.0
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
