ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 8550 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (25.60GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
480 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
480
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.3a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks PRO
(215-0803002)
R500
Architecture
TeraScale 2
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
2.1
OpenGL
4.4
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.0
