ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2000
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
230 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
64MB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
7.360GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
TMUs
8
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.000 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Board Design
32W
TDP
Unknown
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
NV15
-
GPU Variant
GeForce2 Ultra
R500
Architecture
Celsius
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
180 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.025 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
88 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
7.0
2.1
OpenGL
1.5
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
-
