ATI FireMV 2250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
R500
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0
