ATI FireMV 2250 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
19456 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2007
Release Date
Dec 2023
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
192GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
19456
4
TMUs
1216
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV516
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
153 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
N/A
2.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
N/A
