FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 5300
+363%
4632
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
May 2020
FireStream
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
22
800
Shading Units
1408
40
TMUs
88
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Navi 14
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.5
