FireStream 9250 vs FireMV 2260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (63.55GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
760 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+2400%
1000
FireMV 2260
40
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireStream
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
2
800
Shading Units
40
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
RV620
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
