3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce GTX 295
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Jan 2009
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
896MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
448bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
-
Shading Units
240
1
TMUs
80
1
ROPs
28
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
289W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GT200B
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
-
Shader Model
4.0
