3D Rage IIC PCI vs TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Unknown
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
48GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
144
-
Shading Units
18432
1
TMUs
576
1
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
800W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
AD102
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Rage 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.8
