Quadro 400 vs Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 110W)
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
2512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
+7295%
7987
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
40
48
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
99.84 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.97 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
249.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
110W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
TU104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N19E-Q3-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
