Quadro 400 vs Quadro K1200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 45W)
Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
Quadro K1200
+965%
1151
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2015
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
35.97 GTexel/s
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1151 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
35.97 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
45W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GM107
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
GM107-860-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
5.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
