Quadro 400 vs Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
Data Center GPU Max 1100 Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
7120 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+20474%
22220
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
770 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
7168
16
TMUs
448
8
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
100 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
