Quadro 400 vs Quadro K2100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 55W)
Quadro K2100M Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.13GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
Quadro K2100M
+611%
768
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
770 MHz
Memory Clock
752 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
48.13GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
576
16
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.004 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.02 GTexel/s
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
32.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
55W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GK106
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N15P-Q3-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.2
CUDA
3.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
