Quadro 400 vs Quadro 4000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 100W)
Quadro 4000M Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 400
108
Quadro 4000M
+490%
638
Graphics Card
Apr 2011
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
770 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.32GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
6
SM Count
7
48
Shading Units
336
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
7.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
108.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT216
GPU Name
GF104
GT216 GL
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1
