Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S1070 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Lower TDP (130W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1070 +90%
0.622 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

800W
TDP
130W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy